S1.C57. TELL ME WHY - THE WAVE

BY CLOUDY - The Wave, once a groundbreaking inland surf park, collapsed into administration due to poor financial management, investor instability, and failure to secure sustainable long-term funding.

The Wave, the UK’s first and only inland surfing destination, has abruptly closed its doors following the company’s collapse into administration on June 26, 2025. Situated near Bristol, the £25 million attraction had drawn over 400,000 visitors since its 2019 opening, offering a unique artificial surfing experience with waves of varying sizes generated in a 180-meter-long lagoon. Its sudden closure has left both the public and booked customers disappointed, with the website now offline and all future reservations cancelled.

The closure follows months of deepening financial trouble and instability. Though the attraction was initially hailed as an innovative wellness and lifestyle project, its financial foundation proved shaky. The project had accrued significant debt—around £15 million spread across several companies. Efforts to attract new investors and refinance the loans failed to materialize in time, and despite a rescue package being considered in May, the company ultimately shut down operations in June.

Signs of internal distress began emerging earlier in the year. In April, Nick Hounsfield, the founder and public face of The Wave, resigned from the board. Around the same time, The Wave Group Ltd moved from Bristol to London and entered formal administration, appointing Begbies Traynor Group to manage its insolvency process. The company was subsequently renamed SBL Midco, possibly to facilitate restructuring or a sale. The resignation of Hounsfield—whose original vision was to harness surfing as a tool for improving mental health and well-being—symbolized a deeper unraveling of the group’s leadership and identity.

Further complicating matters, one of The Wave’s major backers, JAR Wave, suffered a financial collapse. The bankruptcy of a director at JAR Wave left a funding hole that majority owners Sullivan Street Partners pointed to as a key cause of The Wave's downfall. Despite this setback, Sullivan Street stated that it had invested £27 million into the project in 2023 and remains optimistic about the future. They have hinted at a refinancing plan already underway, which may allow the Bristol site to reopen and creditors to be repaid in full.

The administration process now places the park’s future in the hands of appointed administrators, who must evaluate the assets and identify ways to repay outstanding debts. A moratorium has been placed on legal actions against the company during this process. While a refinancing deal is being pursued, its success remains uncertain.

Notably, The Wave had ambitious plans to expand into London’s Lee Valley Regional Park, but this extension never came to fruition. Had the expansion succeeded, it may have bolstered the project’s financial sustainability through wider reach and brand visibility.

In summary, The Wave’s collapse represents a case where innovative vision outpaced financial discipline. Despite offering a world-class recreational facility and garnering public enthusiasm, the attraction was ultimately undone by poor financial planning, reliance on unstable funding sources, and delayed strategic pivots. The potential for recovery exists, but only if future management couples creativity with sound financial governance.

---

Here are 3 questions for you :

1. “What is our financial break-even point—and how resilient are we to investor exits?”

   • This would have forced the team to model debt risk scenarios and establish contingency funding.

   • It could have led to diversified financing (grants, community bonds, partnerships), reducing dependency on a single investor.

2. “Are we scaling in line with our financial maturity and operational capacity?”

   • Expansion plans (e.g., Lee Valley) were ambitious but premature.

   • A phased growth model with clear KPIs for stability and liquidity might have protected the Bristol site while exploring new markets more sustainably.

3. “What governance structures are in place to maintain continuity if leadership or investors withdraw?”

   • The founder’s resignation and administrative reshuffling created instability.

   • Stronger succession planning, board oversight, and risk audits could have preserved continuity and signaled investor confidence.

---

Provide the question# on your comment when you answer.

READ MORE SCORE MORE

PREVIOUS

NEXT

if you have difficulties accessing any of these documents to read, please feel free to revert to us

Here is a quick guide if you want to change the article into languages of your choice…. but you already know this

07. TRANSLATE IT ALL - ANY LANGUAGE